News >> Browse Articles >> General News
Pittsburgh's 1st Female Fire Chief Demoted
Colleen Walz is "exploring her options" after her demotion.
PIttsburgh Tribune-Review
September 02, 2008
Pennsylvania – Pittsburgh’s first female deputy fire chief has been replaced by a man who four years ago was passed over for the job. Colleen Walz, 46, of Brookline called the move desperately wrong. She said Fire Chief Darryl Jones brought her into his office Downtown on Monday afternoon and told her that she had been reassigned.
Walz will retain her rank of deputy chief for salary and seniority purposes, but her duties will be those of a battalion chief in Oakland, according to Walz and an office memo issued by Jones.
“He said, ‘You are no longer deputy chief,’ and he reassigned me,” Walz said Thursday. “He said it was by court order.”
The order stemmed from a 2006 lawsuit against the city in which Battalion Chief Michael Mullen said he was unfairly passed over for a promotion to deputy chief in favor of Walz.
Mullen sued the city and won. On Monday, Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Timothy P. O’Reilly ordered the city to install Mullen as deputy chief immediately.
According to court records, Mullen was passed over for promotion because of “numerous issues surrounding his attitude and conduct.”
Other firefighters and paramedics accused him of physical and verbal abuse, records show, and Walz once accused him of intimidation, creating a hostile work environment and other charges, leading to a city investigation in 2002.
Mullen was cleared of the charges. Walz sued him in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, and they settled for $60,000.
Walz, who started in 1987 as a firefighter at stations in the Hill District and Brookline, described the reassignment as a de facto demotion “through no fault of my own.”
“I think it is interesting that right in the middle of a huge promotion to try to attract women and minorities to the fire department, this is how the only woman (ranked deputy chief) is being treated,” she said. “This is absolutely insulting.”
Mullen declined to comment. Reached at home, he said the case took “a long, long time, with a lot of painful memories,” adding that he wanted to focus on the future.
His attorney, James DePasquale, said Mullen and the city still are haggling over back pay. When Mullen won the case in March, the city paid him $25,000 in back pay. DePasquale said his client deserves an additional $40,000. O’Reilly will rule on the back pay at a future hearing.
Chief Jones said only that the decision had “absolutely nothing to do with the performance of Deputy Walz. I can’t stress that enough.”
Ed Mann, Pennsylvania state fire commissioner, said he was surprised by the news.
“In my dealings with Colleen and watching her teach classes at the Pennsylvania State Fire Academy, her demeanor and approach to things has always been professional,” Mann said. “In the things that she’s done for us, she’s been more than qualified.”
Last year Walz co-chaired the International Association of Fire Chiefs’ task force to analyze and enhance investigations into firefighter deaths.
“It certainly shocked us when we found out,” said Deputy Chief Billy Goldfeder, chairman of the International Association of Fire Chiefs’ safety health and survival section. “We don’t know the circumstances, but any time someone is reduced in rank, it certainly raises eyebrows.”
Walz said she is “investigating her options.”
GBFD
19 days ago
204 comments
I would have passed him over myself. The fire service does not need anyone with that kind of behavior in it expessially as a cheif.
bravestar09
19 days ago
30 comments
If what they are saying about the guy is true, then its no wonder he was passed over. I just can't believe that the courts would let him win with the types of allegations agaist him.
kvfd701
about 1 month ago
102 comments
I'm glad to see she ended up winning all though it was an unnecessary battle to go through
raevyndreams
2 months ago
110 comments
so wrong. if that guy was meant to have that promotion, he would have gotten it before her. Shame on them!!
FireResQ39
2 months ago
264 comments
Just goes to show you, if you're in a big city and you file a lawsuit, you can have the world handed to you. ESPECIALLY in the fire service! And it's a horrible fact. The fire dept is not the type of job to be handed out to people because they are trying to be politically correct. This job is about life and death. Forget the fact that Walz is a woman. She was better qualified than the man with a "personality problem". But since he sued, he's always in the right. It's a damn shame. It really is.
firefighter70KMS
2 months ago
26 comments
what are people thinking, in this line of work, anyone with attitude problems like Mullen obviously has, should not be in a position of that stature. If he is like what everyone says he is, he's going to do nothing but run the department in the ground, I hope she takes him to court. That's just plain sorry
yankee1
2 months ago
412 comments
I work 4 a living and for a position I feel I deserve.But wont step on anyone ,if a female wins over me then she deserves it . I hope she takes this to the supreme court , and gets what is hers.
JCopen
2 months ago
290 comments
Nothing like steping on people to get ahead. Shame on them for demoting Her.
FireDad6
2 months ago
58 comments
That is not right... Demoting her was sooo wrong... Sounds like the Dept needs an overhaul..
firepolice520
2 months ago
298 comments
Wow I can't believe that they did that to her. Its not right.. If they just promoted her thats not the way to treat someone.. if your trying to get woman on the fire dept thats not the way to do things. they should have worked something out with both of them so that noone would lose there ranks... You go Walz you deserve respect... Good luck with everything fight for what you deserve..
pmansyourdaddy
2 months ago
28 comments
Some people will do whatever it takes to get to the top, even if it means screwing other people over. Firefighting is suppose to be a brotherhood, its sad that crap that like goes on. You'd think that since we are held to a higher standard, those who seem to have issues all that time would start acting like their suppose to. Completely wrong and uncalled for!
AngelJo008
2 months ago
170 comments
I guess this guy never stopped to think of how his decision might effect others' lives, but instead focused on his own greed and needs. What a complete prick!!
slaco
2 months ago
1258 comments
it only takes ONE to ruin it for others ... in the words of my 4yo daughter "what a freep!"
fftonya
2 months ago
388 comments
WRONG JUST PLAIN WRONG!!
emtffdan
2 months ago
1122 comments
It's amazing that our laws allow things like this to go on. If you have a bad attitude you should be held in check. That's just wrong.