Group Forums >> Hardheaded Firefighters >> Leather or Composite?
Leather or Composite?
| back to top |
Posted 7 months ago Which helmet really gives you the best protection? To be completely honest i don't know!! I have never owned a leather helmet but would like someday. Right now i currently own a Bullard UST6 with eyeshields, and i love it! So is a composite helmet giving you better protection or leather? And thanks for inviting me to the group!!!! |
| back to top |
| Posted 7 months ago Well i couldnt tell you scientificly but i own both and love my cairns sam housten and if i could afford another i would buy one for work. I have owned a bullard and carins and also paul conway and i am a big fan of cairns. I would think that they equally protect or the NFPA wouldnt approve of them. I love the cairns brand and wouldnt buy anything else. just think 100+ years of tech. go into the leather. Leather heads forever. FTM-PTB-RFH-EGH
|
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago I have been torn over this question many times, I was once quite fond of the leather, but for me here in california with our urban interface response , I wear the Phenix first due, it is quite light works well for multiple things. I teach technical rescue so I often wear my helmet for most of the day. One of our nearby departments wore the traditional style helmets until the chief started to notice how often his guys were taking them off every chance they had. Like during MVA's the paramedics would have to remove their helmets to get better access the patient. So the department changed to the Phenix as well. I personnally don't like having to carry a wildland helmet with my gear in addition to the rest of the crap I have to carry. My father who is a retired Firefighter wore the traditional style helmet for his career was a little jealous to see the lighter style helmets we wear. Nothing looks as good as a weathered leather helmet, though. kary
|
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago I think they all protect equally well. But noting looks better than a leather helmet. I have a Sam Huston and I love it. It's light enough so that I don't feel weighed down. I had a 1010 and hated the thing. Because of my short stature I was always whacking it on my airpack and it just got too heavy. But the Sam Huston isn't nearly as wide or long in the back. So I say as long as it's NFPA compliant wear whatever you want. How good is a firefighter thats always fussing with his gear? |
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago i do not know ither but i do know as far as names go. when it comes to a structure fire helmet you can not go wrong with a cairnes. they are awsome. we use carnes at my dept. a fellow firefighter was running tanker shuttle on a call this spring. he sat his helmet on the ground next to where the drop tank was set up, and forgot were it was. when the tanker returned to drop its load of water it backed over the helmet. it did no shatter, it did not crack. under the weight of the truck it burried it in the soft ground up to its top. i think i have a picture somewhere i will look. if i find the pic. it will be posted in my photos. Ryan "AXE" Bailey
|
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago We had a member he received new gear with a 1010 and it fell in front of our tanker and land on the cocrete floor and was rain over with our tanker and broke in to little pieces. |
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago I think that it's just personal preference. I've used Composite and Leather. At my home department we have Phenix Leathers(CRAP CRAP!!!!) and they're the worst leathers I've ever encountered, I don't think that they would protect you at all. However out at college I had a Cairns 1010 and it was alright, as far as composites go I think that it's one of the best, it's light weight and has a low profile. I just bought a Paul Conway American Heritage Leather and I love it, it's a little bit heavier but that's to be expected with a leather. It really comes down to what you're department does, if you wear your fire helmet for things other than just firefighting(rescues, forestry, ropes, ect) then you might want some thing lighter. If you don't mind the weight and you want some thing more traditional then a leather is great. |
| back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago I had a 1010 and i thought it was great. I purchased a n5a New Yorker a few days ago and i personally love it. You will know that your wearing after 2 hours but its still great. Your neck muscles deffinetly build up. The guy a bought it from owns a fire store and he said that part of a chimney fell on a firefighters head before and the doctor said that your lucky to be wearing that any other helmet the out come may have changed. The leather is a good investment if your willing to spend the money but you should buy the nfpa approved ones and dont paint it yourself. |
| back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago I have actually worn both and I have to say that I like Both.. Every Fire Helmet goes through the same rigorous Testing weather it be a Modern Traditional or Leather style .. The Only Problem with the Leather Helmet is its very very heavy And if You have to wear one for a long period of time You had better have some strong neck muscles lol .. I prefer the Paul Conway Helmets for Leather.. and For My Money Bullard Makes a Fine Traditional Composite Helmet and So does Cairns
Just My Two Cents and all Sgt. Bobby J. King
|
| back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago I am a 'leatherhead'. That's where I stand on this topic. However look to the major cities. See what they wear. F.D.N.Y. conducted tests some years ago trying different helmet syles. They concluded that the leather helmets were best suited for heavy duty wear, as did Boston, San Francisco, etc. For a few years I had no choice but to wear the Metro when they became issue. I cracked too many outer shells. We went back to the leathers, and had less repairs to contend with. The best eye protection I found was the structural goggles. Each department has to find out what is right for them. Remember. they ALL must meet applicable standards. |
| back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I have Bullard USTM6 traditional and a Morning Pride Ben 2 both are composites. I havent worn a leather but all the leathers I've ever seen were very heavy. I perfer the Ben 2 with the EZ Flips it is really light and very comfortable. I perfer composite but hopful when i become an officer my dad will pass down his red Paul Conway leather Robert T. Garland Jr.
|
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Composite helmets are only rated for one drop test, meaning if you have sub-roofing fall on you and it hits your helmet chances are high that you have micro-fractures and the helmet will shatter or split on the next impact. Leather with maintance done will last you a life time of use, it can take beatings after beatings because it is a natural material. leathers are expensive yes...but they will always out live the service life of a composite. And now NFPA has issued guidelines that ALL Composite helmets WILL be retired 10 years after buying. I use to sell Cairns/MSA helmets, and when you "clap" a composite and leather together I never had a problem getting the department into LEATHER FOREVER ! David "Doorman" Bennett
"Real Men Climb the Ladder, Bitches Ride the Bucket." |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago if you have to ask that question you won't appreciate the answer - it's all about the leather. damn heavy, damn solid, damn cool, damn fine. :) democracy, not theocracy, not now, not ever |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Good question, the only thing I can say is that its hard to beat the look of a leather helmet, I own a N6A Sam Houston by Cairns, but I also have a Cairns 1010 and its a little more forgiving on the scalp due to the weight. If I'm helping/teaching a burn class, I prefer the 1010, but for work, the leather. Both helmets, in my opinion, are sound to me. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I have only ever worn a leather helmet. I think they are great protection. Knock on wood. Hasnt failed me yet. As long as you take care of it, repainting every couple of years. It should hold up. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago i have both and I like leather better it is lighter and if u are working for a long time its the best |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago LEATHER RULES NO QUESTION HERE. All composite helmets are different shaped urinals, vomit bowls with dribble brims My two cents, and you know what they say about opinions. Leather forever. I personally have had three leathers in 21 year career as a volunteer, replaced one because after I dropped it off a three story house during a job, the wire was exposed. One got stolen and I am now on number 3 for the last 10 years and it has seen about 200-300 jobs since I started wearing it. I have even worn it for rope rescue, vehicle rescue, but I will not for hazmats, because I am not carrying that methylethyl bad shit around on my helmet for another 10-15 years till it gives me brain cancer and I DIE. It's not my first rodeo, Cowboy |
| back to top |
| Posted 20 days ago i think that leather does but im not really shure either. |
| back to top |
| Posted 19 days ago I have been in the volunteer fire service for 25 years. I remember we had leather New Yorkers back then and then NFPA wanted helmets to have the impact caps in them. After a few years we got all new Sam Houston's to meet the new standards with the impact cap. I wore my Sam Houston and then we started wearing 66oC Metro's. After a few years I decided I would rather wear my old Leather. The Chief accidentally drove over my leather and it bent but didn't break. After a short while it went back into shape with only some cracks in the paint. Now I continue to wear my Sam Houston. Remember the phrase "Leather Forever" |
| back to top |
| Posted 1 day ago I recently had a Chief from a neighboring Department state that the new NFPA re: "10-yr mandatory retirement" applied to both Composite & Leather. Say it isn't so. I understood that to only apply to the composites. |



